43 Adaptive Management Solutions to Building Coastal Community Resilience
To build resilient coastal communities, collaborative cross sectoral (natural, social, economic, built), ecosystem-based management is essential. A transformative adaptation approach should be applied incorporating environmental, social and economic considerations that allow sustainable change in the face of sea-level rise.
Adaptive management solutions
Below are some key solutions to help address sea-level rise and move towards sustainable social-ecological systems. Click on the tabs below to learn more about each potential management solutions.
Transformative adaptation
Transformative adaptation
Addressing the root causes of vulnerability in the long term by fundamentally changing the structures and functions of ecological or social systems, as well as their feedbacks, to move away from unsustainable trajectories (Fedele et al. 2019; Feola, 2015).
This transformative adaption text is from “Limited use of transformative adaptation in response to social-ecological shifts driven by climate change” © 2020 by Giacomo Fedele, Camila I. Donatti, Celia A. Harvey, Lee Hannah and David G. Hole is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
Coastal modelling, monitoring and early warning systems
Coastal modelling, monitoring and early warning systems
Monitoring over long-time scales to produce more accurate modelling of sea-level rise and other climate impacts.
Developing and implementing advanced early warning systems can help communities prepare for and respond to coastal hazards, including storm surges and flooding.
Integrated Ecosystem-based Coastal Management
Integrated Ecosystem-based Coastal Management
Implement comprehensive coastal management plans that consider the needs of both communities and ecosystems. These plans should balance economic development with environmental protection.
Nature-based barriers
Nature-based barriers
Constructing natural barriers such as dunes, mangroves, and coral reefs can help absorb wave energy and reduce erosion. These ecosystems act as buffers against storm surges and protect coastlines.
Armouring or hardening shorelines
Armouring or hardening shorelines
Anthropogenic, engineered structures like seawalls, levees, and flood barriers can provide protection against rising sea levels and storm surges.
Elevate and Retrofit Infrastructure
Elevate and Retrofit Infrastructure
Elevating buildings and critical infrastructure like power plants, roads, and wastewater treatment facilities can reduce their vulnerability to sea level rise and storm surges. Retrofitting existing infrastructure to withstand flooding and coastal erosion is also crucial.
Managed Retreat
Managed Retreat
In areas that are extremely vulnerable to sea level rise and repeated flooding, it may be necessary to plan for managed retreat. This involves moving communities and infrastructure away from the coastline to safer areas.
There are three retreat approaches: all-at-once, threshold-based, and reactive (Figure 1). All-at-once retreat is the managed, planned, and proactive removal and potentially relocation of communities, buildings, and infrastructure inland. In this approach, all considered properties are acquired and retreated simultaneously and as soon as possible. Threshold-based retreat postpones managed retreat until a predetermined trigger is reached. Here, we base our threshold on a local ordinance, such that the threshold distance is six meters away from the coastal erosion line and we assume dwellings must retreat once the distance to the erosion line is less than the threshold. Threshold-based retreat is triggered on a parcel-by-parcel basis. Both all-at-once and threshold-based retreat enable mitigation of public safety and environmental damage risks. A reactive approach would generally be considered an “unmanaged” approach to retreat; however, there could still be shared intention between government and landowners in this approach, as well as means to lessening public risk. Reactive retreat occurs after major damage or a disaster event, where the only remaining option is evacuation. In this retreat approach, high levels of public safety and environmental damage risks, for example through the introduction of asbestos and lead into the nearshore environment, are potentially incurred. We use the projected erosion line to determine when major damage, such as a dwelling falling onto the beach area, may occur.

Managed retreat led by local governments is only likely to be successful if existing, strong coastal policy and protection laws are in place to address SLR and enable retreat, as has been seen in New Zealand, Alaska, and California (Murphy 2017; Bronen & Chapin, 2013; Lester et al., 2022). Managed retreat has the potential to transform norms surrounding climate change adaptation by prioritising justice issues and considering climate risks rather than just facilitating the movement of people away from hazards, as the burden of adaptation should be equitably distributed (Lawrence et al. 2020; Siders et al. 2021; Tubridy et al. 2021).
This text and image (in the managed retreat section) is from “Managing retreat for sandy beach areas under sea level rise” by Renee O. Setter, Rachael X. Han, Kammie-Dominique Tavares, Conrad Newfield, Alice Terry, Isabella M. Roberson, Nori Tarui & Makena Coffman and published via Scientific Reports, is licensed under CC BY 4.0, except for the introductory paragraph and minor edits to the text and bolding for emphasis, which has been added by Trish Corbett.
Community Engagement and Education
Community Engagement and Education
Building community awareness and resilience is essential. Public education and community engagement programs can help residents understand the risks associated with sea level rise and take proactive measures.
Collaborative, inclusive management
Collaborative, inclusive management
Incorporating all stakeholders including industry, government, local communities and indigenous communities.
Australia’s climate change plan
Australia has a National climate resilience and adaptation strategy. It identifies adaptation that is cross-sectoral spanning natural, social, built and economic domains. To learn more, explore the strategy.

Image Text Version
Figure 2. Four connected domains in the National climate resilience and adaptation strategy
Figure 2 is a diagram entitle ‘Four connected domains in the National climate resilience and adaptation strategy’. The diagram shows 4 connected domains relevant to the National climate resilience and adaptation strategy. The domains are ‘social’, ‘built’, ‘economic’ and ‘natural’ and center around ‘coordinated adaptation’, each are described below.
Social Domain
People, their communities, their culture, institutions, support systems and their interactions. This also includes:
- Health and wellbeing
- Families and community
- Social welfare services
- Emergency services
Built Domain
Human-made surroundings, structures and any supporting infrastructure created using material, spatial and human resources to facilitate life, health, work and play. This also includes:
- Cities and towns
- Utility networks
- Roads
- Buildings and institutions
- Transport
Economic Domain
The production and consumption of goods. Productivity, financial systems, and the economy. This also includes:
- Insurance institutions
- Private sector
- Financial institutions
- Public sector
Natural Domain
The landscapes, seascapes, ecosystems, agricultural lands, and diverse plant and animal life within Australia and its ocean territory. This also includes:
- Agriculture
- Ecosystems
- Coasts
- Heritage
- Water resources
- Land
End Image Text Version
this image is from ‘National Climate Resilience and Adaptation Strategy 2021-2025: Positioning Australia to better anticipate, manage and adapt to our changing climate’ by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, © Commonwealth of Australia 2021, is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
Further reading and viewing
Watch the videos below to see examples of current adaptation to climate change.
Activity: Test your Knowledge
Test your knowledge in the quiz below:
Activity Text Version
Activity: Test your Knowledge
This exercise invites readers to answer questions to test their knowledge, based on the adaptive management solutions to building coastal community resilience information above. Questions and answers are listed below.
Question 1
Choose the correct answer from the following. Adaptive management to sea-level rise should:
- Consider only environmental considerations
- Wait until there is more accurate modelling technology
- Begin once sea-level rise becomes an issue
- Begin now
Answers to question 1
- Begin now
Question 2
Select all correct responses. Adaptive management of sea-level rise should:
- Involve vulnerability reduction for coastal communities
- Involve cross-sectoral collaboration
- Consider social, economic and environmental benefits
- Involve coping strategies such as seawalls when the threat becomes imminent
Answers to question 2
- Involve vulnerability reduction for coastal communities
- Involve cross-sectoral collaboration
- Consider social, economic and environmental benefits
Question 3
Select all correct responses. A coastal community lives in a low lying area, with lots of agriculture down to the waters edge, that is predicted to be inundated as sea-levels rise. If the predicted sea-level height is reached, they will no longer be able to live on the coast. Examples of adaptive management practices that should be considered in a transformative adaptation strategy include:
- Replacing agricultural land by restoring coastal wetlands to provide increased coastal stability, carbon storage, and a buffer against extreme weather
- Managed retreat to an area far enough inland that the predicted sea-level rise will not impact the community
- Integrated ecosystem-based coastal management which includes social, environmental and economic perspectives and all stakeholders
- Build sustainable infrastructure that can withstand increased heat and sea-level rise
Answers to question 3
- Replacing agricultural land by restoring coastal wetlands to provide increased coastal stability, carbon storage, and a buffer against extreme weather
- Managed retreat to an area far enough inland that the predicted sea-level rise will not impact the community
End Activity Text Version
References
Bronen, R., & Chapin III, F. S. (2013). Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23), 9320-9325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210508110
Fedele, G., C. I. Donatti, C. A. Harvey, L. Hannah, and D. G. Hole. (2019). Transformative adaptation to climate change for sustainable social-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy 101:116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.001
Feola, G. (2015). Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: a review of emerging concepts. Ambio 44(5):376-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z
Haasnoot, M., Kwadijk, J., Van Alphen, J., Le Bars, D., Van Den Hurk, B., Diermanse, F., & Mens, M. (2020). Adaptation to uncertain sea-level rise; how uncertainty in Antarctic mass-loss impacts the coastal adaptation strategy of the Netherlands. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 034007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab666c
IPCC. (2022). Summary for policymakers Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ed ed H-O Pörtner et al (Cambridge University Press) 3–33
Lawrence, J., Boston, J., Bell, R., Olufson, S., Kool, R., Hardcastle, M., & Stroombergen, A. (2020). Implementing pre-emptive managed retreat: constraints and novel insights. Current Climate Change Reports, 6(3), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-020-00161-z
Le Cozannet, G., Durand, G., Nicholls, R., Slangen, A., Lincke, D., & Chapuis, A. (2022, November 1). When will a 2-metre rise in sea level occur, and how might we adapt?. Policy Commons. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/21531419/when-will-a-2-metre-rise-in-sea-level-occur-and-how-might-we-adapt/22431619/
Lester, C., Griggs, G., Patsch, K., & Anderson, R. (2022). Shoreline retreat in California: Taking a step back. Journal of Coastal Research, 38(6), 1207-1230. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-22A-00010.1
Murphy, C. Coastal Retreat: Future Implications for Architecture in New Zealand’s Coastal Hazard Zones. in Back to the Future: The Next 50 Years 115–124 (2017).
Oppenheimer M et al. (2019) Sea level rise and implications for low-lying islands, coasts and communities IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate ed ed H-O Pörtner et al (Cambridge University Press) 321–445.
Sayers, P., Moss, C., Carr, S., & Payo, A. (2022). Responding to climate change around England’s coast-The scale of the transformational challenge. Ocean & Coastal Management, 225, 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106187
Siders, A. R., Ajibade, I., & Casagrande, D. (2021). Transformative potential of managed retreat as climate adaptation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 272-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.007
Tubridy, F., & Lennon, M. (2021). Flood risk management,(un) managed retreat and the “relocation fix”: examining shifting responsibilities and compounding risks through two Irish case studies. Local Environment, 26(4), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1901268