26 Integrated Conservation Management
Integrated Conservation Management – Area-based Management tools (ABMT)
With the accelerated goal of conserving 30% of marine and coastal areas by 2030, it is important to consider a range of management tools which incorporate not just environmental protection, but also include cultural, social, and economic factors. Area-Based Management Tools (ABMT) are conservation and management tools across a spatial area including anthropogenic activity regulation such as fisheries, integrated tools that utilise more holistic, ecosystem-based approaches such as marine protected areas and marine spatial planning (Gissi et al., 2022).
Integrated Conservation Management
Marine conservation needs to take an integrated approach to protecting the environment by considering the interconnected components of the environment, including humans, stakeholders including industry, government, the community and traditional custodians. Ecosystems based management (EBM) implements policies and management practices to maintain a healthy, resilient ecosystem (Cormier et al., 2017). An ecosystem-based management approach is applied to marine spatial planning (MSP). In MSP works to design a framework to assesses different marine uses and where and how they can take place and interact to protect cultural, social, economic values linked to ecosystems (Marine and Coastal Policy, 2020). Marine protected areas (MPA) which may be no take areas or those that restrict particular activities, are integrated as part of an ecosystem-based marine spatial planning.
Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning
Click on the sections below to learn more about ecosystem-based marine spatial planning overall and in Victoria.
Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning Introduction
Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning Introduction
Marine spatial planning is a process designed to improve planning, management and governance of the marine environment, and the values and benefits it provides. It can have significant benefits including proactively identifying and reducing potential conflicts between uses, and between uses and natural values, and the protection of economic, social and cultural values linked to the marine environment.
It offers a systematic process for assessing where activities may be compatible or incompatible, and where activities (either individually or cumulatively) conflict with an area’s desired future. The process of marine spatial planning:
- Assesses current and future human activities, informing management options to achieve objectives for a given area
- Is collaborative, with participation from all users, to inform decisions about sustainable and equitable use of marine resources and space
- Is ecosystem-based, strategic and evidence-based
- Is iterative and promotes adaptive management across sectors.
Marine Spatial Planning Victoria
Marine Spatial Planning Victoria
Victoria has a marine spatial planning framework. The Marine and Coastal Act 2018 requires the development of a statewide Marine Spatial Planning Framework (MSP Framework) that provides a process for achieving integrated and coordinated planning and management of the marine environment. The MSP Framework has three primary functions:
- To support integration and coordination of planning and management across marine sectors, the land-sea interface and jurisdictional boundaries
- To support Traditional Owners, marine sectors, marine users and the community to participate in marine planning and management
- To provide a process for:
- Determining where and when marine spatial planning is required
- Initiating, approving and undertaking marine spatial planning, including producing and implementing marine plans.
Intended outcomes
Marine ecosystems are healthy, resilient and functional, retaining their intrinsic value while also providing ecosystem goods and services. Ecologically sustainable and equitable use of the marine environment provides social, cultural and economic benefits, and minimises negative impacts on values. Marine planning and management is:
- Integrated and coordinated
- Inclusive, collaborative and transparent
- Proactive, future oriented and adaptive
- Evidence-based, utilising scientific, social, cultural and economic knowledge and information.
This text is from “Marine and Coastal Policy” by © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2020, which is licensed under CC BY 4.0, except for the introduction and Integrated Conservation Management, which has been added by Trish Corbett.
Follow the QR code below and watch the video to learn more about Victoria’s MSP framework.

Marine Spatial Planning Example
Watch the below video of an example of Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning.
Marine Protected areas
Marine Protected Areas – Introduction
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) encompass a range of protection levels, from fully protected no-take areas to restriction of only particular activities, gear types, user groups, target species or extraction periods. Sciberras et al. (2013) synthesized the results of empirical studies that compared partially protected areas (PPA) to (i) no-take marine reserves (NTR) and (ii) to open access areas (Open), to assess the potential benefits of different levels of protection for fish and invertebrate populations.
This text is adapted from “Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas” by Marija Sciberras, Stuart R Jenkins, Michel J Kaiser, Stephen J Hawkins & Andrew S Pullin is licensed under CC BY 2.0
A review of marine protected area success was carried out by Lester et al., in 2009 indicated that with marine protection, there can be an up to 446% increase in biomass, 166% increase in density of organisms (mean 194% and 61% respectively), as well as up to a 28% increase in individual size (21% average), and 17% increase in species richness (15% mean).
Marine Protected Areas – Design
Watch the videos below to learn more about MPA’s and the importance of design, areas selected to be protected and the need to use a spatial network of MPA’s to protect the whole life cycle of species and important habitats.
Video from the Conservation Strategy Fun on ‘Fisheries Economics and Policy: Marine Protected Areas’:
Video from Rare Hub on ‘Networks of Marine Reserves’:
Marine Protected Areas – Global and Australian Distribution
Globally, there are over 15000 Marine Protected areas (Figure 1) and 60 marine parks are managed by Parks Australia (Figure 2).

This map and its associated caption is from the “Marine Protection Atlas” via Wikipedia, by Russell Moffitt for the Marine Protection Atlas at Marine Conservation Institute, which is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

This map is from the “National Reserve System, National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas and Sea Country Indigenous Protected Areas” by Environment Data & Analysis Branch, Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water © Commonwealth of Australia, February 2025 which is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Marine Protected Areas – Victoria
Parks Victoria manages 13 large marine national parks and 11 smaller marine sanctuaries which are fully protected no-take zones.
Watch the video below to learn more about Victoria’s Marine Protected Areas and how Parks Victoria protects our marine and coastal environment.
Watch the video below to see some of the fantastic work that Deakin’s Marine Mapping Group have done on Victoria’s MPA’s.
Further reading and viewing
Explore the resources below to expand your thinking.
ABC
Article from the ABC ‘Let’s turn a Third of our oceans into marine parks – a good idea?’
South African National Parks
Video from SANParks, which explores ‘the Heart of the Great African Sea Forest in Table Mountain National Park’:
ICES
Video from ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea), which explores ‘Ecosystem-based management’
Activity: Test your Knowledge
Test your knowledge in the quiz below:
Activity Text Version
Activity: Test your Knowledge
This exercise invites readers to answer questions to test their knowledge, based on the integrated conservation management information above. Questions and answers are listed below.
Question 1
This question invites readers to fill-in 2 different terms to complete the definitions.
Answers to question 1
Area-Based Management Tools are conservation and management tools across a spatial area including anthropogenic activity regulation such as fisheries, integrated tools that utilise more holistic, ecosystem-based approaches such as marine protected areas and marine spatial planning
Question 2
A no-take area in the marine environment designed to protect marine biodiversity is best described as:
Select the best option from:
- a marine protected area
- a no-take conservation zone
- an integrated conservation area
- a marine spatial planning area
Answers to question 2
- a marine protected area
Question 3
An effective marine spatial planning framework will
Select all that apply from:
- work with all stakeholders of the space to determine management practices
- consider the needs of local communities
- consider environmental protection
- focus only on marine protected areas management
Answers to question 3
- work with all stakeholders of the space to determine management practices
- consider the needs of local communities
- consider environmental protection
End Activity Text Version
References
Cormier, R., Kelble, C.R., Anderson, M.R., Allen, J.I., Grehan, A., Gregersen, O (2017). Moving from ecosystem-based policy objectives to operational implementation of ecosystem-based management measures. ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 406- 413, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw181
Day, J., Dudley, N., Hockings, M., Holmes, G., Laffoley, D. D. A., Stolton, S., & Wells, S. M. (2012). Guidelines for applying the IUCN protected area management categories to marine protected areas. IUCN.
De Santo, E. M. (2018). Implementation challenges of area-based management tools (ABMTs) for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). Marine Policy, 97, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.034
Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Willis, T. J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S. C., Banks, S., … & Thomson, R. J. (2014). Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature, 506(7487), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022
Gissi, E., Maes, F., Kyriazi, Z., Ruiz-Frau, A., Santos, C. F., Neumann, B., … & Unger, S. (2022). Contributions of marine area-based management tools to the UN sustainable development goals. Journal of cleaner production, 330, 129910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129910
Gjerde, K. M., Reeve, L. L. N., Harden‐Davies, H., Ardron, J., Dolan, R., Durussel, C., … & Warner, R. (2016). Protecting Earth’s last conservation frontier: scientific, management and legal priorities for MPAs beyond national boundaries. Aquatic Conservation, 26.
Halpern, B. S. (2003). The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter?. Ecological applications, 13(sp1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:TIOMRD]2.0.CO;2
Leary, D., Vierros, M., Hamon, G., Arico, S., & Monagle, C. (2009). Marine genetic resources: a review of scientific and commercial interest. Marine Policy, 33(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.05.010
Lester, S.E., Halpern, B.S, Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B.I., Gaines, S.D., Airamé, S., Warner, R.R. (2009) Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 384:33-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08029
O’leary, B. C., Ban, N. C., Fernandez, M., Friedlander, A. M., García-Borboroglu, P., Golbuu, Y., … & Roberts, C. M. (2018). Addressing criticisms of large-scale marine protected areas. Bioscience, 68(5), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy021
O’Leary, B. C., Hoppit, G., Townley, A., Allen, H. L., McIntyre, C. J., & Roberts, C. M. (2020). Options for managing human threats to high seas biodiversity. Ocean & Coastal Management, 187, 105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105110
Roberson, L. A., Beyer, H. L., O’Hara, C., Watson, J. E., Dunn, D. C., Halpern, B. S., … & Runting, R. K. (2021). Multinational coordination required for conservation of over 90% of marine species. Global Change Biology, 27(23), 6206-6216. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15844
Sala, E., & Giakoumi, S. (2018). No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(3), 1166-1168. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx059
Selig, E. R., & Bruno, J. F. (2010). A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss. PLos one, 5(2), e9278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009278
Victoria’s marine and coastal policy. 2020. Chapter 14. Marine Spatial Planning workshop. https://www.marineandcoasts.vic.gov.au/marine-coastal-management/marine-and-coastal-policy