26 Integrated Conservation Management

Integrated Conservation Management – Area-based Management tools (ABMT)

With the accelerated goal of conserving 30% of marine and coastal areas by 2030, it is important to consider a range of management tools which incorporate not just environmental protection, but also include cultural, social, and economic factors. Area-Based Management Tools (ABMT) are conservation and management tools across a spatial area including anthropogenic activity regulation such as fisheries, integrated tools that utilise more holistic, ecosystem-based approaches such as marine protected areas and marine spatial planning (Gissi et al., 2022).

Integrated Conservation Management

Marine conservation needs to take an integrated approach to protecting the environment by considering the interconnected components of the environment, including humans, stakeholders including industry, government, the community and traditional custodians. Ecosystems based management (EBM) implements policies and management practices to maintain a healthy, resilient ecosystem (Cormier et al., 2017). An ecosystem-based management approach is applied to marine spatial planning (MSP). In MSP works to design a framework to assesses different marine uses and where and how they can take place and interact to protect cultural, social, economic values linked to ecosystems (Marine and Coastal Policy, 2020). Marine protected areas (MPA) which may be no take areas or those that restrict particular activities, are integrated as part of an ecosystem-based marine spatial planning.

Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning

Click on the sections below to learn more about ecosystem-based marine spatial planning overall and in Victoria.

Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning Introduction
Marine Spatial Planning Victoria

This text is from “Marine and Coastal Policy” by © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2020, which is licensed under CC BY 4.0, except for the introduction and Integrated Conservation Management, which has been added by Trish Corbett.

Follow the QR code below and watch the video to learn more about Victoria’s MSP framework.

QR code for Victorian Government Marine Spatial Planning website.

Marine Spatial Planning Example

Watch the below video of an example of Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning.

 

Marine Protected areas

Marine Protected Areas – Introduction

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are an area-based management tool (ABMT) meant for conserving the marine environment through the limitation of extractive and destructive human activities (De Santo, 2018; O’Leary et al., 2018; Gjerde et al., 2016). The marine environment and its associated biodiversity is a highly interconnected, complex system and is highly threatened by human activities (Day et al., 2012; Edgar et al., 2014; O’Leary et al., 2020). When designed and implemented effectively, MPAs can maintain, protect, and restore marine biodiversity (Edgar et al., 2014; Halpern, 2003); benefit highly mobile marine species such as whales, sharks, turtles, and straddling fish stocks (Roberson et al., 2021; Selig, 2010); assist in maintaining habitat (Sala & Gaikoumi, 2018); and increase ecosystem resiliency (Leary et al. 2009), among other benefits.
This text is from “Applying Marine Protected Area Frameworks to Areas beyond National Jurisdiction” by Emily S. Nocito, Jenna Sullivan-Stack, Elizabeth P. Pike, Kristina M. Gjerde , & Cassandra M. Brooks is licensed under CC BY 4.0

 

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) encompass a range of protection levels, from fully protected no-take areas to restriction of only particular activities, gear types, user groups, target species or extraction periods. Sciberras et al. (2013) synthesized the results of empirical studies that compared partially protected areas (PPA) to (i) no-take marine reserves (NTR) and (ii) to open access areas (Open), to assess the potential benefits of different levels of protection for fish and invertebrate populations.

This text is adapted from “Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas” by Marija Sciberras, Stuart R Jenkins, Michel J Kaiser, Stephen J Hawkins & Andrew S Pullin is licensed under CC BY 2.0

A review of marine protected area success was carried out by Lester et al., in 2009 indicated that with marine protection, there can be an up to 446% increase in biomass, 166% increase in density of organisms (mean 194% and 61% respectively), as well as up to a 28% increase in individual size (21% average), and 17% increase in species richness (15% mean).

Marine Protected Areas – Design

Watch the videos below to learn more about MPA’s and the importance of design, areas selected to be protected and the need to use a spatial network of MPA’s to protect the whole life cycle of species and important habitats.

Video from the Conservation Strategy Fun on ‘Fisheries Economics and Policy: Marine Protected Areas’:

Video from Rare Hub on ‘Networks of Marine Reserves’:

Marine Protected Areas – Global and Australian Distribution

Globally, there are over 15000 Marine Protected areas (Figure 1) and 60 marine parks are managed by Parks Australia (Figure 2).

Map, Global Marine Protected Areas. as of November 2022. Map covers levels of protection, including Highly-Fully Protected Zones, Less Protected Zones/Unknown, and Pending Implementation/Proposed.
Figure 1. Global Marine Protected Areas as of Nov 2022.

This map and its associated caption is from the “Marine Protection Atlas” via Wikipedia, by Russell Moffitt for the Marine Protection Atlas at Marine Conservation Institute, which is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

Map, National Reserve System, National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas and Sea Country Indigenous Protected Areas
Figure 2. Australia’s Marine Protected areas.

This map is from the “National Reserve System, National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas and Sea Country Indigenous Protected Areas” by Environment Data & Analysis Branch, Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water © Commonwealth of Australia, February  2025 which is licensed under CC BY 4.0

Marine Protected Areas – Victoria

Parks Victoria manages 13 large marine national parks and 11 smaller marine sanctuaries which are fully protected no-take zones.

Watch the video below to learn more about Victoria’s Marine Protected Areas and how Parks Victoria protects our marine and coastal environment.

Watch the video below to see some of the fantastic work that Deakin’s Marine Mapping Group have done on Victoria’s MPA’s.

Further reading and viewing

Explore the resources below to expand your thinking.

ABC

Article from the ABC ‘Let’s turn a Third of our oceans into marine parks – a good idea?’

South African National Parks

Video from SANParks, which explores ‘the Heart of the Great African Sea Forest in Table Mountain National Park’:

ICES

Video from ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea), which explores ‘Ecosystem-based management’

Activity: Test your Knowledge

Test your knowledge in the quiz below:

Activity Text Version

Activity: Test your Knowledge

This exercise invites readers to answer questions to test their knowledge, based on the integrated conservation management information above. Questions and answers are listed below.

Question 1

This question invites readers to fill-in 2 different terms to complete the definitions.

Answers to question 1

Area-Based Management Tools are conservation and management tools across a spatial area including anthropogenic activity regulation such as fisheries, integrated tools that utilise more holistic, ecosystem-based approaches such as marine protected areas and marine spatial planning

Question 2

A no-take area in the marine environment designed to protect marine biodiversity is best described as:
Select the best option from:

  • a marine protected area
  • a no-take conservation zone
  • an integrated conservation area
  • a marine spatial planning area
Answers to question 2
  • a marine protected area
Question 3

An effective marine spatial planning framework will
Select all that apply from:

  • work with all stakeholders of the space to determine management practices
  • consider the needs of local communities
  • consider environmental protection
  • focus only on marine protected areas management
Answers to question 3
  • work with all stakeholders of the space to determine management practices
  • consider the needs of local communities
  • consider environmental protection

End Activity Text Version

References

Cormier, R., Kelble, C.R., Anderson, M.R., Allen, J.I.,  Grehan, A., Gregersen, O (2017). Moving from ecosystem-based policy objectives to operational implementation of ecosystem-based management measures. ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 406- 413, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw181

Day, J., Dudley, N., Hockings, M., Holmes, G., Laffoley, D. D. A., Stolton, S., & Wells, S. M. (2012). Guidelines for applying the IUCN protected area management categories to marine protected areas. IUCN.

De Santo, E. M. (2018). Implementation challenges of area-based management tools (ABMTs) for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). Marine Policy, 97, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.08.034

Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Willis, T. J., Kininmonth, S., Baker, S. C., Banks, S., … & Thomson, R. J. (2014). Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature, 506(7487), 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022

Gissi, E., Maes, F., Kyriazi, Z., Ruiz-Frau, A., Santos, C. F., Neumann, B., … & Unger, S. (2022). Contributions of marine area-based management tools to the UN sustainable development goals. Journal of cleaner production, 330, 129910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129910

Gjerde, K. M., Reeve, L. L. N., Harden‐Davies, H., Ardron, J., Dolan, R., Durussel, C., … & Warner, R. (2016). Protecting Earth’s last conservation frontier: scientific, management and legal priorities for MPAs beyond national boundaries. Aquatic Conservation, 26.

Halpern, B. S. (2003). The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter?. Ecological applications, 13(sp1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:TIOMRD]2.0.CO;2

Leary, D., Vierros, M., Hamon, G., Arico, S., & Monagle, C. (2009). Marine genetic resources: a review of scientific and commercial interest. Marine Policy, 33(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.05.010

Lester, S.E., Halpern, B.S, Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B.I., Gaines, S.D., Airamé, S., Warner, R.R. (2009) Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 384:33-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08029

O’leary, B. C., Ban, N. C., Fernandez, M., Friedlander, A. M., García-Borboroglu, P., Golbuu, Y., … & Roberts, C. M. (2018). Addressing criticisms of large-scale marine protected areas. Bioscience, 68(5), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy021

O’Leary, B. C., Hoppit, G., Townley, A., Allen, H. L., McIntyre, C. J., & Roberts, C. M. (2020). Options for managing human threats to high seas biodiversity. Ocean & Coastal Management, 187, 105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105110

Roberson, L. A., Beyer, H. L., O’Hara, C., Watson, J. E., Dunn, D. C., Halpern, B. S., … & Runting, R. K. (2021). Multinational coordination required for conservation of over 90% of marine species. Global Change Biology, 27(23), 6206-6216. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15844

Sala, E., & Giakoumi, S. (2018). No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75(3), 1166-1168. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx059

Selig, E. R., & Bruno, J. F. (2010). A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss. PLos one, 5(2), e9278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009278

Victoria’s marine and coastal policy. 2020. Chapter 14. Marine Spatial Planning workshop. https://www.marineandcoasts.vic.gov.au/marine-coastal-management/marine-and-coastal-policy

Licence

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Sustainable Marine Futures Copyright © 2026 by Deakin University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.