28 Social and cultural inclusion in conservation
To sustainably manage marine ecosystems and biodiversity, a wholistic approach which incorporates the three pillar of sustainability must be applied. Considering local communities, Indigenous Peoples, and the socioeconomic aspects of conservation are essential as the world works towards successfully protecting 30% of the worlds oceans by 2030. A sustainable ocean can provide food and other resources, livelihoods, economic growth and environmental protection allowing marine and human communities to thrive.

‘A Line of People on a Beach’ by Sudheera Bandara used under a Pexels License
Socioeconomic benefits of marine ecosystem and biodiversity conservation.
Conserving biodiversity through measures such as marine protected areas (MPAs), and ecosystem-based spatial planning, increases the size, number and types of organisms present which allows greater catch in fisheries providing benefits to local communities in terms of a food source and economic value. Habitat protection can increase other ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, oxygen production, tourism and recreation which in turn benefit local communities.
To achieve successful marine protected areas which provide benefits to local communities, integrated collaborative management incorporating all stakeholders, community education and increased communication between stakeholders as well as enforcement and monitoring protocols (Di Cintio et al., 2023).
Efficient functioning of MPAs can be sustained by prioritising the involvement of stakeholders in MPA design, implementation and management, as well as by improving communication channels between management authorities and stakeholders (mostly, fishers). The ultimate goal of these factors is that of working to improve stakeholders’ acceptance of MPAs, which represents a pivotal component of MPA effectiveness.
This text is from “Avoiding “Paper Parks”: A Global Literature Review on Socioeconomic Factors Underpinning the Effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas” by © 2023 Antonio Di Cintio, Federico Niccolini, Sara Scipioni and Fabio Bulleri, licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland, which is licensed under CC BY 4.0, except for the first two section paragraphs, which has been added by Trish Corbett.
Social inclusion and integrated collaborative management are key to conservation management
Check out the TED talk video below, where Alasdair Harris shares how a handful of fishing villages sparked a marine conservation revolution.
Empowering Indigenous Peoples and communities through local marine stewardship and ocean defenders.
Recent years have seen growing attention to the role of local environmental stewardship and environmental defenders in protecting nature and safeguarding the basic human right to a healthy environment. Environmental stewardship refers to action undertaken by various groups and communities to sustainably use, manage, protect or restore species, habitats, or ecosystems (Bennett et al. 2018).

Moa Island (Kubin) Rangers by © Australian Institute of Marine Science 1996, Dr Ray Berkelmans (Australian Institute of Marine Science) via eAtlas is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Marine stewardship refers to actions to sustainably use, manage, protect, or restore the marine and coastal environment. This might include, for example, management of local fisheries (through establishing gear restrictions, catch limits, or size rules), protection of certain areas or species (through area closures, temporal closures, species restrictions), or restoration of habitats or important ecological areas (such as wetlands, mangroves, coral reefs, spawning areas). Locally driven efforts to manage, protect, or restore coastal and marine resources, biodiversity, and critical habitats have been documented around the world (Table 1). For example, small-scale fishers have collaboratively implemented gear and harvesting rules to manage their own fisheries (McConney, Medeiros & Pena, 2014), coastal communities have created locally managed marine areas to balance sustainable use and marine protection (Jupiter et al., 2014), and Indigenous Peoples have established complex institutions and management regimes to protect marine resources (Ban, Wilson & Neasloss, 2020). Women, youth and elders play a central, albeit often unrecognised, role as leaders and managers in marine stewardship efforts (Michalena et al., 2020).
Table 1. Examples of local marine stewardship activities
| Activity | Detail |
|---|---|
| Locally managed marine areas (LMMAs) | Coastal and marine areas managed by nearby communities to balance the use of marine resources and protection of biodiversity. LMMAs are characterized by local control and autonomy, but may receive support from governments or partner organisations. |
| Indigenous and community conserved areas (ICCAs) | Territories or areas voluntarily established and managed by Indigenous Peoples or local communities, through customary laws or other means, to protect ecosystems, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and cultural values. ICCAs include tribal parks, territories of life, Indigenous protected and conserved areas, Indigenous protected areas. |
| Community-based marine protected areas (CBMPAs) | Coastal and marine areas in which harmful activities are restricted and human use is managed for the purposes of biodiversity protection. BMPAs are implemented and managed by communities, sometimes with support from governments or other organisations. |
| Community-based fisheries management (CBFM) and natural resource management (CBNRM) | Community-driven and customary approaches to manage fisheries and marine resources by coastal communities and small-scale fishers’ organisations. Governance and management activities, including decision-making, negotiating access, enforcing rules, resolving conflicts, and restoration actions, are based on local customs and traditional knowledge. Some management measures, such as area or species taboos, are enacted based on cultural or religious beliefs and practices. |
| Community-based coastal adaptation and mitigation | Community-driven efforts to adapt to the effects of climate change using nature-based solutions (e.g., saltmarsh restoration as a defence against flooding) or to contribute to mitigation efforts (e.g., locally driven carbon sequestration projects in seagrass or mangrove areas that provide economic and livelihood benefits to communities). |
| Local coastal ecosystem restoration initiatives | Activities or processes that support degraded or destroyed marine ecosystems (e.g., mangroves, seagrass meadows, coral reefs, beaches) to recover using local knowledge, capacity, and approaches. |
| Local food cultivation through area or species management | Active management of certain areas, habitats or species by local and Indigenous communities for the purpose of food production and subsistence (e.g., clam gardens in Canada, traditional fishponds in Hawaii). |
Local marine stewardship practices are often the continuation or resurgence of long-standing or customary practices, that have developed over time, based on traditional knowledge, religious or cultural beliefs (e.g., taboo areas), and an intimate connection to place (Johannes, 2002; von der Porten et al., 2019). Other local stewardship initiatives – such as the creation of community-based marine protected areas (Kockel et al., 2019), climate change mitigation efforts linked to the protection of mangroves or seagrass to sequester carbon (Vierros, 2017), and the restoration of coastal wetlands to provide a buffer against flooding or rising sea levels (Wilson & Forsyth, 2018) – have emerged more recently in partnership with networks of communities and organisations, in order to capture the economic benefits from new carbon markets, or in response to emerging climate threats.

‘Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary pelican’ by Melburnian is licensed under CC BY 3.0
Ocean defenders are individuals and groups who defend and protect the marine and coastal environment and the human rights of coastal populations against existential threats. Coastal environments and populations can, for instance, be threatened by the incursion or impacts of ocean-based economic development, the legal or illegal dumping of pollution or hazardous wastes, or the over-harvesting of local marine resources by external actors (Bennett et al., 2021; Ertör, 2021).
This text and table is from “Local marine stewardship and ocean defenders” 2022, by Nathan J. Bennett, Philippe Le Billon, Dyhia Belhabib & Paula Satizábal, which is licensed under CC BY 4.0, except for the bolded words to add emphasis to the text, which has been added by Trish Corbett.
Examples: Local marine stewardship and ocean defenders
Watch the below video from ‘The Nation’ which looks at the work of the Guardian Watchmen from the Kitasoo Xai’xais First Nation and their work in Kitasu Bay and the wider traditional territory.
Further reading and viewing
Watch the below video from the ‘Coral Sea Foundation’ to explore the Sea Women Great Barrier Reef Program.
Activity: Test your Knowledge
Test your knowledge in the quiz below:
Activity Text Version
Activity: Test your Knowledge
This exercise invites readers to drag and drop 3 different terms to complete the definitions related to Social and cultural inclusion in conservation. The answers are as follows:
- Marine stewardship refers to actions to sustainably use, manage, protect, or restore the marine and coastal environment. This might include, for example, management of local fisheries (through establishing gear restrictions, catch limits, or size rules), protection of certain areas or species (through area closures, temporal closures, species restrictions), or restoration of habitats or important ecological areas (such as wetlands, mangroves, coral reefs, spawning areas).
- Ocean defenders are individuals and groups who defend and protect the marine and coastal environment and the human rights of coastal populations against existential threats.
- Environmental stewardship refers to action undertaken by various groups and communities to sustainably use, manage, protect or restore species, habitats, or ecosystems.
End Activity Text Version
References
Ban, N. C., Wilson, E., & Neasloss, D. (2020). Historical and contemporary indigenous marine conservation strategies in the North Pacific. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13432
Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2021). Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Marine Policy, 125, 104387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104387
Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental management, 61(4), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
Di Cintio, A., Niccolini, F., Scipioni, S., & Bulleri, F. (2023). Avoiding “paper parks”: a global literature review on socioeconomic factors underpinning the effectiveness of marine protected areas. Sustainability, 15(5), 4464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054464
Ertör, I. (2023). ‘We are the oceans, we are the people!’: fisher people’s struggles for blue justice. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(3), 1157-1186. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1999932
Jupiter, S. D., Cohen, P. J., Weeks, R., Tawake, A., & Govan, H. (2014). Locally-managed marine areas: multiple objectives and diverse strategies. Pacific Conservation Biology, 20(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC140165
Kockel, A., Ban, N. C., Costa, M., & Dearden, P. (2020). Evaluating approaches for scaling‐up community‐based marine‐protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13368
Johannes, R. E. (2002). The renaissance of community-based marine resource management in Oceania. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics, 33(1), 317-340. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150524
McConney, P., Medeiros, R., & Pena, M. (2014). Enhancing stewardship in small-scale fisheries: Practices and perspectives. Too big to ignore (TBTI) and centre for resource management and environmental studies (CERMES), The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados.
Michalena, E., Straza, T. R., Singh, P., Morris, C. W., & Hills, J. M. (2020). Promoting sustainable and inclusive oceans management in Pacific islands through women and science. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 150, 110711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110711
von der Porten, S., Ota, Y., Cisneros-Montemayor, A., & Pictou, S. (2019). The role of indigenous resurgence in marine conservation. Coastal Management, 47(6), 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2019.1669099
Wilson, A. M. W., & Forsyth, C. (2018). Restoring near-shore marine ecosystems to enhance climate security for island ocean states: aligning international processes and local practices. Marine Policy, 93, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.018
Vierros, M. (2017). Communities and blue carbon: the role of traditional management systems in providing benefits for carbon storage, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods. Climatic Change, 140(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0920-3